گونه‌شناسی و سیر تحول تاروکتونی در بستر میترائیسم غربی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه تاریخ و باستان شناسی، واحد تهران مرکزی،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه باستان شناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران/ رئیس پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی کشور

3 استادیار گروه تاریخ و باستان شناسی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

10.22051/jtpva.2024.45876.1557

چکیده

آیین پررمزوراز مهر بر اساس منابع مذهبی و تاریخی همچنین شواهد و یافته‌های باستان‌شناختی، پهنه جغرافیایی وسیعی دارد. مهرپرستی برخلاف دامنه گسترده، منابع آیینی بسیار محدودی دارد. همین امر اساس مبهم ماندن بسیاری از حقایق آیین را فراهم آورده است. بر این بنیاد برای کشف اسرار میترا باید به جستجو در شواهد و یافته‌های بصری در فضاهای آیینی فرقه یا به عبارتی میترائیوم‌ها (مهرابه‌ها) بپردازیم. یکی از رایج‌ترین شواهد، صحنه تاروکتونی یا گاوکشی مِهری است. این پیشگاه همچون یک متن آیینی عمل می‌کند و به انجام و باورهای میترایی دلالت دارد. از‌این‌رو پژوهش حاضر به بررسی سرشت و نمادهای تاورکتونی پرداخته و در صدد پاسخ به این پرسش‌ها است: 1) سیر تحول صحنه تاورکتونی در بستر میترائیسم غربی چگونه بوده است؟ 2) بر پایه تغییر و تحولات رخ‌داده می‌توان گروه یا مکتب هنری ویژه‌ای برای خلق صحنه‌ها در نظر گرفت؟ 3) نخستین الگو در پیوند با کدام محیط جغرافیایی و برگرفته از چه فرهنگ و مکتبی است؟ این پژوهش با روش تحقیق توصیفی - تحلیلی - آماری – تطبیقی و بر اساس مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای استوار است. نتایج بررسی سیر تحول صحنه‌ها را در طول سده‌های متوالی پیدایش تا زوال نشان می‌دهد که در پاره‌ای از موارد در افتراق و تشابه هستند. بر این بنیاد می‌توان آن‌ها را در سه گروه یا مکتب هنری وابسته به شرق، مرکز و غرب دسته‌بندی کرد که هر یک گویای پتانسیل هنری و فرهنگی تک‌تک اعضای جامعه میترایی است. همچنین نخستین الگو به لحاظ قدمت در ارتباط با مصر و مکتب وابسته به شرق است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Typology and Evolution Process of Tauroctony in the Western Mithraism

نویسندگان [English]

  • Atena َAbdolimasinan 1
  • Mostafa Dehpahlavan 2
  • Mahmood Seyyed 3
1 PhD Student Department of History and Archaeology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran/ Head of the research institute for Cultural Heritage and Tourism
3 Assistant Professor Department of History and Archaeology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Mithraism, also known as the Religion of Mithras, is one of the ancient and well-documented religions of the ancient East, with origins tracing back to the second millennium BCE. Archaeological and religious sources indicate that this ritual entered the Indian subcontinent and the Iranian plateau via the Indo-European peoples. Over time, Mithraism spread westward as a religious bricolage, affecting cultures from East to West and existing in the West under the name Mithraism until the 4th century CE. Mithraea, or temples dedicated to Mithras, represent significant centers of worship for Mithraists. These sacred places were where the devotees gathered to carry out their religious obligations and rituals. Notably, Mithraea display remarkable artistic and architectural features, with one of the most iconic being the religious depiction of the Tauroctony scene at the center of the altar. The Tauroctony is a central motif within Mithraic worship, usually shown as a representation of Mithras sacrificing a bull in the presence of his companions. This scene, whether depicted in reliefs, sculptures, plaques, or paintings, is not only an artistic expression but also an essential and inseparable part of Mithraic cult centers. It is considered a key symbol of the Mithraic Mysteries, a system of secret religious teachings and rituals associated with the cult of Mithras.
The Tauroctony scene, showing Mithras in the act of bull-sacrifice, plays a vital role in conveying the philosophical and theological principles of Mithraism. This scene, drawn in various forms across the geographical spread of Mithraism, reflects a consistent conceptualization of the cult’s underlying beliefs, despite regional variations. The term Tauroctony, meaning "bull-slaying," was first used by the Roman poet Statius in the 1st century CE in his epic Thebaid. The word and the scene it represents have been a subject of scholarly interpretation ever since. German scholar Franz Stark initially linked the Tauroctony motifs to stars and constellations, associating each character in the scene with a counterpart in the zodiac. His work was later contested by the Belgian scholar Franz Cumont, who proposed that the Tauroctony motif had its roots in the ritual practice of sacrificing a bull and bathing in its blood for the "Great Mother" goddess in Phrygia, Asia Minor. As a result, scholars have proposed two distinct interpretations of Tauroctony: an Eastern-Avestan interpretation and a Western-astronomical one. While these interpretations differ, most agree that the ritual structure of Tauroctony is central to understanding the eschatology and purpose of Mithraic practice.
Due to the lack of original written texts from the Mithraic religion, the Tauroctony scene serves as one of the few reliable sources for studying Mithraism and its rituals. These visual representations not only demonstrate the religious affiliation of the worshippers with Mithras, but also offer a glimpse into the timing and execution of their sacred rituals. As such, this motif plays a pivotal role in understanding the cult of Mithras and the development of its religious art. The research into the Tauroctony scene attempts to clarify several important aspects of Mithraism: its etymology, the origins of its artistic representations, and how the scene evolved geographically and over time. This study seeks to identify the time and place of the earliest known examples of the Tauroctony, the geographical framework of its expansion, and the artistic developments that took place in different regions.
This paper examines and analyzes 61 examples of Tauroctony scenes from 19 different countries worldwide, using a descriptive-analytical-statistical-comparative approach. The chosen examples were selected from regions with a small but notable number of Tauroctony representations, as well as from books, scholarly articles, and catalogs. The study adopts a comparative methodology, which assumes that Mithraism originated in the East and traces the spread of Tauroctony scenes from East to West. The 61 selected samples provide a comprehensive view of the geographical spread of this religious symbol over a period of approximately 900 years, offering valuable insights into how the Tauroctony motif evolved over time and space.
The study's primary focus is the classification and typology of the Tauroctony scenes, which reveals key insights into the artistic continuity and change within the Mithraic tradition. These changes are reflective of the different stages in the artistic training of early Mithraic artists, as well as the distinct artistic schools that developed in various regions of the Mithraic world. The 61 examples are categorized based on three main criteria: 1) the technical features of the Tauroctony scene, including object type, gender, inscription, dimensions, the number of characters depicted, and symmetry; 2) the main characters of the Tauroctony scene, such as Mithras, the bull, the snake, the dog, and the scorpion; and 3) the secondary characters, which include the raven, Mithras's companions, Sol and Luna, as well as additional elements like lions, stars, zodiac signs, and aquatic animals. Once these scenes are classified, they can be further typologized into different types and styles. This typology is essential for understanding how the Tauroctony scene was adapted to communicate particular theological or philosophical ideas specific to each region.
The typology of Tauroctony scenes is crucial for understanding how they evolved over time. Each of the scenes within the three categories can be depicted in several different forms or subspecies. This means that the Tauroctony scene had multiple variations that differed based on the location, the community’s specific beliefs, and the local iconography. By analyzing these variations, it becomes clear that the changes in the Tauroctony scenes were not random; rather, they reflect the changing beliefs and religious ideologies of Mithraic practitioners as they spread across different cultures. The evolution of these scenes provides insight into the theological concepts emphasized by Mithraic artists in different periods and geographical locations.
The study concludes that there were three main artistic schools responsible for the creation of Tauroctony scenes: the Eastern, Central, and Western schools. These schools correspond to the three primary geographical regions where Mithraism flourished, with each region contributing distinct features to the representation of the Tauroctony. In each of these artistic schools, changes in the design of the scenes occurred as the cult spread, shaped by regional beliefs and the preferences of local communities. Some artistic features of the Tauroctony scene were created in one region and later exported to others, while some features remained confined to their original location. These regional variations of the Tauroctony scene carry valuable insights into the local religious beliefs, regional iconography, and the transmission of Mithraic rituals from one area to another.
In terms of chronological development, the oldest known examples of Tauroctony scenes are from the Achaemenid period in Egypt. The styles used in these early examples can be seen as the models for later representations of the Tauroctony scene. Over time, as Mithraism spread from the East to the West, the artistic style of the Tauroctony scene evolved, with each region incorporating its own cultural influences. This progression is evident in the changes in the portrayal of the main and secondary characters, as well as the incorporation of additional elements like the zodiac signs, celestial bodies, and animals. These variations reflect the diverse religious, astronomical, and cultural influences that shaped the Mithraic world.
In conclusion, the Tauroctony scene is a central and enduring symbol of Mithraism, representing both the religious beliefs and the artistic traditions of Mithraic worshippers across different regions and periods. Through the study of the typology and evolution of these scenes, this research highlights the adaptability and continuity of the Mithraic cult, offering insights into how religious motifs evolved over time and how they were influenced by the changing social, cultural, and geographical contexts of the Mithraic world.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tauroctony
  • Bull Slaying
  • Mithraium
  • Mehrabeh
  • Mithraism
  • اولانسی، دیوید (1396). پژوهشی نو در میتراپرستی کیهان‌شناسی و نجات و رستگاری در دنیای باستان، ترجمه مریم امینی، چ. چهارم، تهران: نشر چشمه.
  • جوادی، شهره (1395). "پی­یِتا" در مسیحیت و "گاوکشی"مقدس در آیین میترا چگونگی تداوم باور و هنر آیینی در تاریخ از طریق تحلیل نقش­برجسته و نقاشی، فصلنامه هنر و تمدن شرق، سال 4، شماره 11، 15-20.
  • چلیپا، کاظم (1402). مطالعه تطبیقی گاوکشی میترا و نبرد رستم و دیو سفید در نگاره­های دوران مختلف و نقاشی قهوه­خانه­ای، نشریه علمی باغ نظر، سال 20، شماره 128، 5-12.
  • شورت‌هایم، المار (1371). گسترش یک آیین ایرانی در اروپا، ترجمه نادر قلی درخشانی، چ. نخست، کلن: انتشارات مهر.
  • کومُن، فرانتز (1386). دین مهری، ترجمه احمد آجودانی، چ. اول، تهران: نشر ثالث.
  • کومن، فرانتس (1393). آیین پررمزوراز میترایی، ترجمه هاشم رضی، تهران: انتشارات بهجت، چاپ سوم.
  • مرکلباخ، راینهولد (1394). میترا (آیین و تاریخ)، ترجمه توفیق گلی­زاده، چ. دوم، تهران: نشر اختران.
  • منصورزاده، یوسف؛ بهفروزی، مینو (1397). تحلیلی بر آیین قربانی میترا و نمادهاای آن بر اساس آثار هنری، نشریه هنرهای زیبا- هنرهای تجسمی، دوره 23، شماره 4، 51-60.
  • واثق عباسی، عبدالله؛ فولادی، یعقوب (1396). دگردیسی اسطوره آفرینش مهری در عرفان ایرانی اسلامی (با تکیه بر اشعار مولوی)، نشریه ادبیات عرفاتی و اسطوره شناختی (زبان و ادبیات فارسی)، دوره 13، شماره 47، 343-362.
  • یغمایی، اسماعیل (1402). نیایش مهر در ایران (بر پایه کاوش­های باستان­شناسی در مهرکده­های دشتستان-برازجان)، چ. نخست، تهران: نشر دادکین.
  • Alterumskunde, J. F. (1908). Forgotten Books publisher, (Vol. 2).
  • Beck, R. (2006). The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire; Mysteries of the Unconquered Sun, Oxford University Press.
  • Belayche, N. (2006). L'imagerie des divinités "orientales" in: Corrine Bonnet &c., "Religions orientales - culti misterici,
  • Blakely, S. (2019). Social Mobility: Mithraism and Cosmography in the 2nd-5th Centuries CE, Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia, 31. 11–41.
  • Clauss, M. (2000). The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Csaba, S. (2012). Searching for the Light-bearer. Notes on a Mithraic Relief from Dragu, 32. 135-143.
  • Comunt, F. (1896). Textes et Monuments Figurés relatifs aux Mystères de Mithra, (Vol. 2), Bruxelles : Lamertin.
  • Cumont, F. (1903). Mysteries of Mithra. Dover Publication.
  • Frothingham, A. L. (1918). A New Mithraic Relief from Syria, American Journal of Archaeology, 1. 54-62.
  • Hopfe, L. M. and Lease. (1975). The Caesarea Mithraeum: A Preliminary Announcement, The Biblical Archaeologist, 1. 2-10.
  • Hopfe, L. M. (1994). Archaeological indications on the origins of Roman Mithraism, in Lewis M. Hopfe (ed). Uncovering ancient stones: essays in memory of H. Neil Richardson, Eisenbrauns, 15-25.
  • Insler, s. (1978). A new interpretation of the Bull-Slaying motif, (Vol. 2), Hommages a Maarten J. Vermaseren.
  • Mayorga, C. R. (2018). Mithraic iconography in Hispania, reinterpretation of the catalogue and new findings, Acta Ant, 173–199.
  • Mazhjoo, N. (2021). Being Mithraist: Embracing ‘other’ in the Roman cultural milieu, Community and Identity at the Edges of the Classical World, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 139-153.
  • Merkelbach, (1984). Mithras, Hain.
  • Miletic, Z. (2005). Typology of Mithraic Cult Reliefs from Southeastern Europe, Religija i mit kao poticaj rimskoj provincijalnoj plastici: akti VIII. međunarodnog kolokvija o problemima rimskog provincijalnog umjetničkog stvaralaštva / Sanader, Mirjana ; Rendić-Miočević, Ante (ur.). Zagreb: Golden marketing - Tehnička knjiga, 269-275.
  • Nabraz, P. (2005). the Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief that Shaped the Christian World, Inner Traditions.
  • Nadeau, J. T. (2020). How the Mithraeum of the Mithraic Cult Functioned as Sacred Space in Rome, University of Calgary.
  • Neumann, (1956). Die Fortschritte der Vindobonaforschung 1948 bis 1954 in Carinthia I, Voaw.
  • Parker, PH. (2010). The empire stops here: a journey along the frontiers of the Roman world, Pimlico.
  • Plemić, B. and Vasiljević. (2021). Acontribution to the study of the cult of the god Nithra in Moesisa superior: Findings from the middle and southern Morava vally, Archaeology and Science, 17. 83-97.
  • Sabeh, (1953). "Sculptures palmyréniennes inédites du musée de Damas", Annales Archéologiques de Syrie 3, 17-26.
  • Silnovic, N. (2022). Invicto Mithrae spelaeum fecit: Typology and Topography of Mithraic Temples in the Roman province of Dalmatia, Budapest: The medieval studies department, Central European University.
  • Stark, K. B. (1869). Die Mithrassteine Von Dormagen, Jahrbucher des Vereins von Altertumsfreunden in Rheinlande, 46. 1-25.
  • Sharafeldean, R. M. (2021). Archaeological and Historical Evidences of the Existence of the Cult of Mithra in Egypt in the Greaco-Roman Period, Journal of association of Arab Universities for tourism and hospitality (JAAUTH), December. 5. 79-99.
  • Thompson, E. (2008). Composition and continuity in Sasanian rock reliefs, Iranica Antiqua, 299-358.
  • Van Buren, A. W. (1936). Ancient Rome As Revealed by Ancient Discoveries, Lovat Dickson.
  • Vermaseren, M.J. (1956). Corpus Inscriptionum et Monumentorum Religionis Mithriacae. Hagae Comitis: M. Nijhoff.
  • Will, E. (1950). La date du Mithraeum de Sidon, Syria, 27. 261-69.

 

Museum invenntory number:

  • Archaeological Museum of Patras, Greece, Inv. No. AMP 19.
  • Archaeological Museum, Split, Croatia, Inv. No. 164, D.
  • Archaeological Museum, Split, Inv. No. 413D.
  • Archaeological Musuem Regionale, Palermo, Inv. No. 751.
  • Archaeological Museum, Zagreb, Inv. No: 123. CIL 03, 10034.
  • Archaeological Museum, Zagreb, Inv. No. 16.
  • Archaeological Museum, Zagreb. Posted by Tom Ljevar, 2014. From: Twitter.
  • Brukenthal Museum, Inv. No. 7162.
  • London Museum, Inv. No. A 16933.
  • Louvre Museum, Inv. No. 1023.
  • National Museum, Bulgaria, Inv. No. II 6.
  • National Museum of Union Alba Iulia, Inv. No. 204/II.
  • National Museum Warsaw, Inv. No. 198788 MNW.
  • National Museum Warsaw, Inv. No. 143396 MNW (MND 2215).
  • Pleven Regional Historical Museum, Bulgaria, jpg (39664338810).
  • Rheinisches Landesmuseum, Bonn, fig. 262.
  • Saalburg Museum. From: Pinterest.
  • Walters Arts Gallery, Baltimore, Greece, Inv. No. 42.1342.
  • Vatican Museum, CILVI 721= VI, 30820 cf. p. 3757 (ILS 1615). CC BY-SA 3.

URLs: