Bell, David. A. (1999). Husserl-Arg Philosophers. (Fereydoun Fatemi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
• Benvidi, Fatemeh. (2016). Dufrenne’s Conception of Aesthetic Object in Poetry. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 18, 1-20.
• Bourriaud, Nicolas. (2002). Relational Aesthetics. Les presses du reel (English trans). Djon.
• Candy, Linda. (2014). Evaluation and Experience in Art. In Candy L. & Ferguson S. (Eds), Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice (pp. 25-48), London: Springer.
• Craig, Edward. (2013). Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Routledge.
• Dehbashi, F. & Ayatollahi, H.R. (2009). Husserl's Phenomenology: Pure Idealism or Transcendental Idealism?. Ma’refat-e Falsafi, 4, 139-172.
• Dewey, John. (2012). Art as Experience. (Masoud Olya, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnoos.
• Edgar. A; Sedgwick. P. (2009). Cultural Theory: The Key Concepts. (Mehran Mohajer & Mohammad Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran: Agah.
• Edmonds, E. (2014). Human Computer Interaction, Experience and Art. In Candy L. & Ferguson, S. (Eds), Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice (pp. 11–23). London: Springer.
• Gaut, Berys & Lopes, Dominic. (Eds) (2014). The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics (Farhad Sasani et al, Trans.). Tehran: Matn.
• Ghorbani, Mohammad Reza. (2005). The Question of the Inter-Subjectivity from Merleau Ponty's Viewpoint. Farhang-e-Andisheh, 12, 83-112.
• Gordon, S., Daanen, P. & Moghaddam, F. (2013). Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations In Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
• Kwaste, Katja. (2013). Aesthetics of Interaction in Digital Art. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• L. Farinas, Rebecca. (2014). Intersubjectivity as Virtues in Dewey’s Relational Aesthetics. In Ferreira A. R & Nolasco, A. (Eds.),Creative Processes in Art: Proceedings of the International Colloquium (pp. 51-72). FBAUL, Lisbon.
• Loke, L. & Poonkhin Khut, G. (2014). Intimate Aesthetics and Facilitated Interaction. In Candy L. & Ferguson, S. (Eds.), Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice (pp. 91-108). London: Springer.
• Makaryk, Irene Rima. (2011). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms. (Mehran Mohajer & Mohammad Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran: Agah.
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (2012). The World of Perception. (Farzad Jaber-al-Ansar, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnoos.
• Millet, Catherine. (2011). L'art Contemporain Histoire et Geograohie (Mahshid Nonahali, Trans.). Tehran: Nazar.
• Minissale, Gregory. (2009). Framing Consciousness in Art: Transcultural Perspectives. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
• Olya, Masoud. (2016).The Place of the Sensuous in Dufrenne's Phenomenology of Art. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 18, 95-109.
• Primozic, Daniel Thomas. (2009). On Merleau-Ponty. (Mohammad Reza Abolghasemi,Trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
• Qaderi, E. & Marasy, M. (2014). A Study on How to Define and Draw Distinctions between Various Types of Participation/ Interactive-based Arts. Global Media Journal, 1, 88-112.
• Ramin, Ali. (2013). Philosophical and Sociological Theories in Art (2nd Ed.). Tehran: Ney.
• Rashtipour, Mani. (2015). The Affective a Priori: A Look into Aesthetic Experience for Mikel Dufrenne. Philosophical Investigation, 27, 43-55.
• Sampaio, Juliano Casimiro de Camargo & Simão, Lívia Mathias. (2013). Narrative and Creation: Intersubjectivity and Negotiation of Meaning in the Interactive I – Other Experience. Interaccoes, 24, 137-169.
• Sebti, S., Rahbarnia, Z. & Khabbazi Kenari, M. (2016). Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophical Concepts: The Basis for the Analysis of Interactive Art in Performance of ‘Field’. Kimiya-ye-Honar, 19, 43-55.
• Simon, S.L. (2014). Interactive Art, Autonomy and Evaluation. In Candy L. & Ferguson, S. (Eds.), Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice (pp. 63-74). London: Springer.
• Stern, Nathaniel. (2013). Interactive Art and Embodiment: The Implicit Body as Performance Arts. Canterbury: Gylphi.
• Younesi, Mostafa. (2004). Classic Texts in Inter-subjectivity. Farhang-e-Andisheh, 12, 11-34.
• Zeymaran, Mohammad. (2005). Inter-subjectivity and Dialogue. Farhang-e-Andisheh, 12, 113-126.
URLs:
• http://www.newarthistory.co.uk [Accessed 5 June 2015]
• https://www.interaction-design.org [Accessed 23 January 2015]
• http://georgekhut.com [Accessed 5 March 2014]
• http://en.wikipedia.org [Accessed 1 January 2016]