A genealogical study of Tohfa Soleimani's version (Sabah al-Akhbar) based on Panovsky's iconography theory

Document Type : Original/Research/Regular Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Painting, Faculty of Art, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 MA, Visual Communication, Art University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Throughout the history of human civilization, genealogy writing has been one of the ways of providing genealogical information, which has been written in different forms such as ancestor list, family tree, genealogy, pedigree, etc.).                                             
In ancient civilizations, genealogies are part of the cultural material that, in order to identify and check the lineage of each family, they have been a source of pride for that culture and civilization. Genealogies or tree of life are among those manuscripts that are abundant in Iran. It is available in the form of a booklet and a scroll .These versions require research and visual reading. Currently, very limited studies have been carried out in this field and they are still pristine and first-hand.
There are several copies of such works in libraries and museums, which require deep cultural and anthropological research. In this article, one of these manuscripts, called "Tohfa Suleimani or Sabhat Al-Akhbar (926-974 A.H.)" which was written by the order of one of the Ottoman kings named Shah Suleiman and according to the narration of Yusuf Ibn Abd al-Latif has been chosen to be studied and analyzed in terms of the motifs in this genealogy from the perspective of Panofsky iconography. This manuscript is kept in the library of the Islamic Consultative Assembly of Iran under registration number 17966. This booklet is written in Naskh calligraphy on 72 pages. It has a grid and golden circles and black, red and gold symbols which are simultaneously and comparative deals with the narratives of several dynasties including Ottoman Turks, Iran, Prophets and Mongols and their classification in different countries over time.                                                                           
 The intention of iconography is to describe the subject and content of this artwork through Erwin Panofsky's three-step reading, i.e. description, analysis and interpretation of the image. The process of analysis is from the whole to the parts and in three levels of pre-iconographical description, iconographical analysis and iconological interpretation, from the general description of what is evident to the analysis and interpretation of the hidden layers of meaning and content in the work.
The purpose of this article is to analyze and examine the images, relationships and visual arrangement of the pages in order to discover their meaningful relationships. In order to achieve this goal, the following questions were raised: 1. What were the goals of the Ottoman rulers in ordering this genealogical copy? 2. Based on Panofsky's theory, what hidden meanings and concepts do the arrangement of text and motifs imply?
This research is of qualitative analysis type and analyzes data based on iconography theory. The first step is to describe the preview of the version. This stage is a primitive level and a natural subject. The second level includes the decoding of images in the framework of artistic meaning. In this case, unlike the previous case, we are not dealing with a tangible meaning, but with something reasonable, that is, literary content. The third level deals with the intrinsic and inner meaning of the image. It takes into account the time and place of image creation and the prevailing culture at that time and place and the wishes of the forerunners. This level is a combination of interpretation that combines data from various sources and includes cultural foundations, available contemporary texts, texts transferred from past cultures, artistic backgrounds and such things. Data collection is a library and in some sources references are in the form of URLs. The studied version was prepared from the first-hand documents of the Majlis Library and in the analysis of research cases and referencing, books and articles from reputable websites of Iran and the world have been used.
As a result of research and in order to obtain answers to the questions of this research, it was found that after many conquests, the Ottoman family achieved relative stability in the kingdom, especially during the rule of Sultan Suleiman. In this period, in order to elevate their government and acceptability among the subjugated tribes and superiority over their neighbors, they created works of this kind. To give more legitimacy and stability to their kingdom by connecting their ancestors with divine prophets. Also, by capturing Baghdad and other Islamic cities and establishing an Islamic government, the Ottomans benefited from the cultural influence of the peoples under their rule. Paying attention to relative roots is one of the honors that was especially important among ethnic groups, especially Arabs and Muslims, and the tradition of genealogy has been remembered since these days. This also caused the creation of many genealogical manuscripts during the Ottoman era. After the conquest of Baghdad by the Ottomans, the influence of Baghdad book-making, especially the genealogical branch, can be considered in the form, simplicity, and black spacing of motifs. On the other hand, following the transfer of Iranian artists and writers to the Ottoman art workshops, Iranian influence can be seen in the copies of this Ottoman era.
In the reading of the different levels of these images, it was determined based on Panofsky's three levels, the template used in this version consists of several circles that are connected to each other by simple black lines and creates a form of a genealogy booklet in which the oldest human ancestor at the beginning and the last ones are on the last pages. From the examination of the beginning and end of these lines, the narration of several levels of the history of different dynasties is comparatively going on in this version. This format has turned the book into an ancient infographic that depicts the entire human history up to the 11th century AH simultaneously in the most complete and simplest way possible.
The approach of the discussion resulted in the fact that the thinking used in the way of arrangement and visual arrangement of the genealogical maps of this version was the result of the spirit of its time and like other Ottoman works, it was influenced by the atmosphere of Iranian book design. In addition, this version borrows the thoughts of the Byzantine painting tradition and the Baghdad school. These influences are repeatedly evident in the composition of the symmetry, spiral, fringes, and golden halos. Also, all the colors are metaphorical and formed according to the mystic-Islamic symbols ruling the time. The purposeful use of golden, red, blue, and black colors in different proportions for different people and families shows this claim. This version, while being abstract, has the most allegory and color perspective and authority. The existence of Iranian, Baghdad and Byzantine painting characteristics in a new fusion, shows the roots of the formation of the work and speaks of the creation of a new style of Ottoman painting based on these principles.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Adams, L. (2013). Methodology of Art. (Translated by Ali Masoumi).Tehran: Nazar.
  • Alami, M. R. and Safari Forushani, N. (2012). The Science of Genealogy and Its Place in the Classification of Sciences. History of Islamic Culture and Civilization. Summer. 7. 85-108.
  • Al-Thanavi, M. A. (1414 AH). Kashaf al-Istlahat al-Funun and Uloom. Lebanon: Maktab al-Lebanan Nashrun.
  • AYĞAN, A. (2020) Osmanlılarda Resimli Silsilenâme Geleneği: 16. Yüzyıl Sonu-17. Yüzyıl Başları. Yüzyıl Başları. ARTS: Artuklu Sanat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi. 4. 154-181.
  • Bağcı, S., Çağman F., Renda, G. ve Tanındı Z. (2006). Osmanlı Resim Sanatı. İstanbul: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
  • Bakhtavar, E. and Shirazi, A. (2009). How the Ottoman School Formed and Investigating Its Characteristics. Negreh. Spring. 10, 31-41.
  • Bigdeli, S., Akbari Gandmani, H., Mohammadi Kale Sar, A. (2006). Symbols of Immortality (Analysis and Study of the Symbol of the Circle in Religious and Mythological Texts). Researches of Mystical Literature. Spring. 1. 79-98.
  • Bolkhari Qahi, H. (2013). About the Theory of Simulations (Art Theory in Greek Philosophy and Islamic Wisdom). Tehran: Hermes.
  • Bolkhari Qahi, H. (2015). Qadr: Theory of Art and Beauty in Islamic Civilization. Tehran: Soore Mehr.
  • Cooper, J. 2009 (2010). Illustrated Dictionary of Traditional Symbols. (Translated by M. Karbasian). Tehran: Farshad.
  • Duame Liv, J. (2007). Perspective in Drawing and Painting. (Translated by A. Sherveh). Tehran: Bahar.
  • Farhangpour, Y. (2021). How to use Iconography and Iconology in Artwork Criticism Based on Panofsky Opinion (Case study: The Brera Madonna by Piero della Francesca). Ferdows Art. March. 3. 72-85. doi: 10.30508/fhja.2021.140173.1039.
  • Farrokhfar, F., Khazaei, M., & Hatam, G. A. (2012). Ottoman Painting Approach to Achievements of Iranian Art (A Comparative Study Between Persian & Ottoman Paintings, First Half of 16th Century). Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts. October. 49. 19-30. doi: 10.22059/jfava.2012.28517
  • Gülcü, E. (1999). Osmanlı İdaresinde Bağdat (1534-1623). Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Hafez Shirazi, Sh. M. (2011). Diwan Hafez. Tehran: Payam Edalat.
  • Halaçoğlu, Y. (1991). Bağdat. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi İstanbul: TDV. 4. 441-442.
  • Hasenmueller, G. (1978). Panofsky, Iconography and Semiotics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Published By: Wiley. (Vol. 36). 3, 289-301.
  • Holy Quran (2000). Translated by Elahi Qomshaei. Qom: Al Hadi.
  • Jafarian, R. (2009). Mukhtasar al-Tawarikh Suleimani or Tohfe Suleimani (The Chronological History of the World from the Beginning to the Safavid Era). Payame Baharestan. Fall. 5. 685-730.
  • Jafarian, R. (2011). Documents About How To Compile The Genealogies of Sadat Mousavi (Belonging To Hazrat Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Ali Rouzati). Baharestan Documents. Spring. 1, 293-342.
  • Jafarian, R. (2017). History of Safavid Kings: From Tahmasb to Abbas I from Tohfe Soleimani. Journal of Historical Articles and Treatises. 4. 375-384.
  • Jung, C. G. (2000). Man and His Symbols. (Translated by M. Soltanieh). Tehran: Jami.
  • Keller, K., Reddy, P., and Sachdeva, S. )2015(. Family Tree Visualization. Cambridge: University Cambridge.
  • Khajeh Ahmad Atari, A. R., Azarbayejani, M., Shaery, H. R., & Hekmat, Z. (2018). The History of Themes, Subjects and Visual Structure of Imaginary Paintings (Khialinegari) in Iran`s art of Qajar Era (According to written documents). Islamic Art Studies. March. 29. 171-200. doi: 10.22034/ias.2018.91851.
  • Khalili, M. (2009). Analysis of Holbein's Painting of Ambassadors based on Panovsky's Theory. Naqshmayeh Visual Arts Quarterly. Spring and Summer. 3, 99-108.
  • Kobra, N. (1975). Fawaeh al-Jamal and Fawath al-Jalal. (Translated by M. B. Saedi. Tehran: Marvi.
  • Mohammadzadeh M, Abolhasan Moghaddami S, Charkhi R. (2018). The Study of Evolution of Illustrations of Ascension in Ottoman Miniature, 15-17 A.D. Journal of Islamic Crafts. Spring and Summer. 1. 53-65.
  • Monique De, M. (1998). The Living Secrets of the World. (Translated by J. Sattari). Tehran: Markaz.
  • Nasri, A. (2010). Iconography and Iconography Approach in Art Studies. Roshd Magazine. Fall. 23. 56-64
  • Nasri, Amir (2012). Reading Image with Erwin Panofsky. Kimiya-ye-Honar. Spring. 6. 20-7.
  • Pakbaz, R. (2017). Iranian Painting from Ancient Times to Today. Tehran: Zarin va Simin.
  • Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the Visual Arts. New York: Double day Anchor Books.
  • Riyazi, M. R. (2019). World Art History. Tehran: Ministry of Education and Educational Research and Planning Organization.
  • Samaran, Ch. (1992). Research Methods in History. (Translated by A. Bigonah). Mashhad: Astan Qods Razavi.
  • Siqueiraa, E. S., Kabongoa, P. Tiancheng Lib, C., Castanhoa, C. D., and Weiganga, L. (2016). On Chinese and Western Family Trees: Mechanism and Performance. Salamanca: University of Salamanca (USAL), ADCAIJ. No. 5, 11-29.
  • Tajvidi, A. (2007). A Look at Painting from the Beginning to the 10th Century H.A, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
  • Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (2011). Osmanlı Tarihi: İstanbul’un Fethinden Kanuni Sultan Süleyman’ın Ölümüne Kada. Cilt 2. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
  • Vaez Kashfi, M. H. (1972). Soltani's Fatut Nameh. (Introduction and Correction by M. J. Mahjoub). Tehran: Farhang Iran Foundation.

 

  • قرآن کریم (1379). ترجمه مهدی الهی قمشه‌ای، قم: الهادی.
  • آدامز، لوری (1392). روش‌شناسی هنر، ترجمه علی معصومی، تهران: نظر.
  • التهانوی، مجمدعلی (1414ق.). کشاف الاصطلاحات الفنون و العلوم، لبنان: مکتب اللبنان ناشرون.
  • بخت‌آور، الهه و شیرازی، علی‌اصغر (1388). « نحوه شکل‌گیری مکتب عثمانی و بررسی ویژگی‌های آن»، نگره، شماره 10، 31- 41.
  • بزرگ‌بیگدلی، سعید؛اکبری‌گندمانی، هیبت‌الله، محمدی‌کله‌سر، علیرضا (1386). «نمادهای جاودانگی (تحلیل و بررسی نماد دایره در متون دینی و اساطیری)»، پژوهش‌های ادب عرفانی، شماره 1، 79- 98.  
  • بلخاری قهی، حسن (1392). در باب نظریه محاکات (نظریه هنر در فلسفه یونانی و حکمت اسلامی)، تهران: هرمس.
  • بلخاری قهی، حسن (1394). قدر: نظریه هنر و زیبایی در تمدن اسلامی، چ. سوم، تهران: سوره مهر.
  • پاکباز، رویین (1396). نقاشی ایرانی از دیرباز تا امروز، چ. سیزدهم، تهران: زرین و سیمین.
  • تجویدی، اکبر (1386). نگاهی به نقاشی از آغاز تا سده دهم هجری، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
  • جعفریان، رسول (1388). «مختصرالتواریخ سلیمانی یا تحفه سلیمانی (تاریخ مجدول عالم از آغاز تا عصر صفوی)»، پیام بهارستان، شماره 5، 685-730.
  • جعفریان، رسول (1390). «اسنادی درباره‌ چگونگی گردآوری شجره‌نامه‌های سادات موسوی (متعلق به حضرت آیت‌الله سید محمدعلی روضاتی)»، اسناد بهارستان، شماره 1، 293-342.
  • جعفریان، رسول (1396). «تاریخ شاهان صفوی: از طهماسب تا عباس اول از تحفه سلیمانی»، مقالات و رسالات تاریخی، شماره 4، 375-384.
  • حافظ شیرازی، خواجه شمس‌الدین‌محمد (1390). دیوان حافظ، تهران: پیام عدالت.
  • حکمت، زینب؛ خواجه احمد عطاری، علیرضا؛ آذربایجانی، مسعود و شعیری، حمیدرضا (1397). «پیشینه مضامین، موضوعات و ساختار بصری خیالی‌نگاری‌های دوره‌ قاجار در هنر ایران (با تکیه بر منابع مکتوب)»، مطالعات هنر اسلامی، شماره29، 171-200.
  • خلیلی، مریم (1388). «تحلیل تابلوی سفیران اثر هولباین بر اساس نظریه پانوفسکی»، نقش‌مایه، شماره3، 99-108.
  • دوآمه لیو، ژوزف (1386). پرسپکتیو در طراحی و نقاشی، ترجمه عربعلی شروه، تهران: بهار.
  • دوبوکور، مونیک (1376). رمزهای زنده جهان، ترجمه جلال ستاری، تهران: نشر مرکز.
  • ریاضی، محمدرضا (1398). تاریخ هنر جهان، تهران: وزارت آموزش و پرورش سازمان پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزشی.
  • ساماران، شارل (1370). روش‌های پژوهش در تاریخ، ترجمه ابوالقاسم بیگناه و همکاران، مشهد: معاونت فرهنگی آستان قدس رضوی.
  • عالمی، سید محمدرضا و صفری فروشانی، نعمت الله (1391). «علم انساب‌نگاری و جایگاه آن در طبقه‌بندی علوم»، تاریخ فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی، شماره 7، 85-108.
  • فرخ‌فر، فرزانه؛ خزایی، محمد و حاتم، غلامعلی (1391).«نگارگری عثمانی با رویکرد به دستاوردهای هنری ایران (بررسی تطبیقی نگارگری عثمانی و نگارگری ایران نیمه نخست قرن دهم)»، هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی، شماره 49، 19-30.
  • فرهنگ‌پور، یاسمن (1399). «چگونگی به کارگیری آیکونوگرافی و آیکونولوژی در نقد اثر بر پایه نظریه پانوفسکی (مطالعه موردی: مکالمه مقدس پیئرو دلا فرانچسکا)»، فردوس هنر، شماره 3، 72-85.
  • کبری، نجم الدین (1368). فوائح الجمال و فواتح الجلال، ترجمه شیخ محمد باقر ساعدی، تهران: مروی.
  • کوپر، جی. سی (1379). فرهنگ مصور نمادهای سنتی، ترجمه ملیحه کرباسیان، تهران: فرشاد.
  • محمدزاده، مهدی؛ ابوالحسن مقدمی، سودا و چرخی، رحیم (1396).«بررسی سیر تحول معراجنگاری عثمانی در قرن‌های 9-11 ه.ق.»، هنرهای صناعی اسلامی، شماره 2، 53-65.
  • نصری، امیر (1389).«رویکرد شمایل نگاری و شمایل شناسی در مطالعات هنری»، رشد آموزش هنر، شماره 23، 56-64.
  • نصری، امیر (1392). «خوانش تصویر از دیدگاه اروین پانوفسکی»، کیمیای هنر، شماره 6، 7-20.
  • واعظ کاشفی، مولانا حسین (1350). فتوت نامه سلطانی، مقدمه و تصحیح محمد جعفر محجوب، تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
  • یونگ، کارل گوستاو (1378). انسان و سمبل‌هایش، ترجمه محمود سلطانیه، چ. دوم، تهران: جامی.

 

 

  • AYĞAN, A. (2020) Osmanlılarda Resimli Silsilenâme Geleneği: 16. Yüzyıl Sonu-17. Yüzyıl Başları. Yüzyıl Başları. ARTS: Artuklu Sanat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi. 4. 154-181.
  • Bağcı, S., Çağman F., Renda, G. ve Tanındı Z. (2006). Osmanlı Resim Sanatı. İstanbul: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
  • Gülcü, E. (1999). Osmanlı İdaresinde Bağdat (1534-1623). Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Halaçoğlu, Y. (1991). Bağdat. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi İstanbul: TDV. 4. 441-442.
  • Hasenmueller, G. (1978). Panofsky, Iconography and Semiotics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Published By: Wiley. (Vol. 36). 3, 289-301.
  • Keller, K., Reddy, P., and Sachdeva, S. )2015(. Family Tree Visualization. Cambridge: University Cambridge.
  • Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the Visual Arts. New York: Double day Anchor Books.
  • Siqueiraa, E. S., Kabongoa, P. Tiancheng Lib, C., Castanhoa, C. D., and Weiganga, L. (2016). On Chinese and Western Family Trees: Mechanism and Performance. Salamanca: University of Salamanca (USAL), ADCAIJ. No. 5, 11-29.
  • Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (2011). Osmanlı Tarihi: İstanbul’un Fethinden Kanuni Sultan Süleyman’ın Ölümüne Kada. Cilt 2. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.

URL1:https://mirasebaharestan.ical.ir/Search/DocumentDetails/27803?HighlightWords=%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%81%D9%87%20%D8%B3%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%20%20