Designs, Motifs and Production Methods of Textile Hangings Used in the Living Space during the Qajar Period

Document Type : Original/Research/Regular Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor. Faculty Member of Applied Arts, University of Art, Tehran

2 Assistant Professor, Research Center of Traditional Arts, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism organization, (RICHT). Tehran

Abstract

The Qajar dynasty ruled over Iran for about 130 years (1796-1925). As the Qajar rule in Iran coincided with the Industrial Revolution in the west, traditional methods of textile production were gradually replaced with industrial manufacturing methods and similar imported textiles. However, handicrafts and conventional textile production and finishing supplied the domestic demands to a large extent for a long time. Textiles with “Mihrabi” (altar) and “Toranj-dar” designs, whose production was dependent on advanced weaving techniques such as Ikat or finishing processes including “Qalamkar” printing and “Ruduzi” (embroidery) because of the application of principle of axial symmetry (mirroring), were used to finish and decorate living spaces and shelters like houses, palaces, and camps in the Qajar period in Iran. This study aimed to examine textiles with mihrabi and Toranj-dar designs in this use. Accordingly, the main question was: What were the usual designs, motifs, uses, and production methods of textile hangings in living spaces in the Qajar period? Most previous studies have focused on frequent instances in clothing, highlighting the significance of studying textiles. Moreover, Mihrabi and Toranj-dar designs (used frequently in Qajar hangings according to the study hypothesis) were neither used in the clothing of the time because of the mirroring principle nor portrayed often in the numerous Qajar paintings - as a crucial area of research. Therefore, this study attempted to explore this neglected topic in depth using primary historical sources such as travelogues, pictures, and available images of tangible instances preserved at museums. In this descriptive-historical study, the data were collected through library research, indexing, and image analysis. Qajar travelogues by Charles Auguste Bontemps, Maurice de Kotzebue, James Justinian Morier, James Baillie Fraser, J. M. Tancoigne, Gaspard Drouville, Joseph Arthur de Gobineau, Mme Carla Serena, Heinrich Karl Brugsch, Ernest Orsolle, Henri Moser, Joannes Feuvrier, Charles James Wills, Henry d'Allemagne, Eugene Aubin, and Clara Colliver Rice were examined. Images and tangible instances at the National Museum of Iran, Golestan Palace, and Institute for Iranian Contemporary Historical Studies, and works preserved at museums abroad including the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, the Brooklyn Museum, the Cleveland Museum of Art, and Hamid Tavakoli’s private collection were analyzed. The retrieved instances were categorized and a total of 22 Qajar textile hangings with half (Mihrabi) and quadric (Toranj-dar) axial design were selected. Sixteen hangings had Mihrabi design and six had Toranj-dar design. The results of the qualitative study of texts and images demonstrated that the textile industry was fundamentally changed in the Qajar era by the industrial methods and extensive imported textiles. Nonetheless, domestic productions with conventional methods supplied most of everyday demands for textile from the royal court to the economically disadvantaged classes of the society. It can be concluded that handicraft workshops in cities like Kashan, Yazd, Mashhad, and Isfahan were active in golabatoon-duzi, abrisham-bafi, shawl-bafi, shaar-bafi, chelvar-bafi, cotton weaving, and other crafts in the early years of Qajar period in Iran. In the early decades of the 19th century, Iranian industries survived the insecure conditions after the fall of the Safavid dynasty and was revived when the Qajar rule was firmly established. However, political developments in this period along with Iran’s expansion of business relations put domestic crafts in a competition with the imported western goods. As small domestic industries were not able to keep up with them, the workshops shrank in number. According to credible historical documents, in mid-Qajar period and during the rule of Naser al-Din Shah, various textiles with different qualities were produced with traditional methods but sold in competition with imported textiles. As this trend continued and foreigners pushed to dominate the Iranian market, the advancement of domestic production was grievously hindered. Therefore, although handicrafts survived for the first fifty years of Qajar rule, Iranian traditional industries failed to prosper except in carpet weaving and other crafts whose products Europeans favored. Research on Qajar textiles has focused in used instances in clothing; however, some designs like Mihrabi and Toranj-dar that follow the principle of axial symmetry (in half and quadric form, respectively) have been neglected since they were considered unfit for the aesthetics requirements in clothing at the time. Furthermore, such designs are often known by loom weavings or with their use in mats like prayer rugs or “Boghcheh” (a kind of bindle used for packaging small-sized items), while textiles with axially symmetric designs were extensively used as hangings in living spaces in the Qajar period. This study indicated that textiles with Mihrabi design were largely used as louvers, curtains, brackets, wall hangings, and tent coverings. In addition to these uses, especially as louvers - although less than textiles with Mihrabi design - textiles with Toranj-dar design were used particularly as “Taqcheh” (niche) and mantelpiece coverings. Other designs such as “Ravai”, “Vagireh” (tangled), “Afshan” (scattered), “Muharramat” (striped), and “Katibeh” were also used for these purposes and some like Ravai and katibeh designs seem to be have been prominent as wall hangings (particularly during public mournings). Nonetheless, the historical written sources and analysis of images of instances showed that Mihrabi and Toranj-dar designs were more frequent in textile hangings, decorated in most cases with floral motifs. In Mihrabi design, human and animal forms were also used. In fact, textiles with Mihrabi design used as tent coverings and wall hangings foregrounded the human role and thus, the final product was more fit for the inner part of the living space rather than outside. on the other hand, Mihrabi and Toranj-dar textiles with floral and animal motifs were used both inside and outside the living space. Sometimes geometric motifs were used in Mihrabi and more frequently in Toranj-dar designs given the embroidery technique known as “Cheshmeh-duzi”. However, overall, floral motifs were more dominant and woven symmetrically. As the mirrored designs followed the principle of axial symmetry and avoided repetitive patterns all over the work, creating these designs was very difficult at the time of production, and when created during weaving, complex techniques such as embossing and Ikat were used. Therefore, the designs were often created with finishing processes such as Qalamkar printing and Ruduzi (embroidery) like Cheshmeh-duzi, Rashti-duzi (Rasht embroidery), and Golabatoon-duzi. The results of this study indicated that symmetrical (mirrored) designs as Mihrabi and Toranj-dar with floral motifs were the most frequent ones in the production and weaving of Qajar textile hangings used as louvers, curtains, wall hangings (particularly during ceremonies and feasts), and Taqcheh, mantelpiece, and tent coverings despite the use of other designs and motifs (even plain forms). Nonetheless, human and animal motifs were also used, although less frequently, in Mihrabi design and geometric motifs were used in both Mihrabi and Toranj-dar designs according to the weaving technique (Cheshmeh-duzi). Therefore, although other designs including Vagireh, Katibeh, and Ravai or even plain textiles were also used, Mihrabi and Toranj-dar designs with floral motifs or minor human and animal forms, particularly in Mihrabi design, were the most used textile hangings in living spaces during the Qajar period. They were supplemented by floral forms and sometimes animal motifs following the “Gereft-o-gir” (animal fight) motif or birds on branches of trees, for which Qalamkar printing was often used. In sum, textile hangings in various colors and qualities resulting from different production techniques were used in living spaces during the Qajar period in Iran. The textile hangings were used to refine the living space and the most frequent designs were Mihrabi and Toranj-dar, respectively, with the dominance of the floral motif.
 
This article was extracted from the first author’s research project titled ''Analysis and Categorization of the Designs and Motifs on Qajar Textiles (1796–1925 AD)''. Approved by the Research Center of Traditional Arts in Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism organization (RICHT), this in-progress project aims to link University of Art in Tehran with the society and industry.

Keywords


  • Arbabi, B. (2014). Kargah-e Sannye Dasti (Baft) (Handicraft Workshop (Weaving). (10th). Tehran: Sahami-e Khas.
  • Aubin, E. (1983). La Perse d'aujourd'hui- Iran, Mésopotamie (French Edition). (Translated by A.S. Saeedi.). Tehran:
  • Bontemps, Ch. A. (1975). Voyage en Turqiu et en Perse 1807 (French Edition). (Translated by M. Nezammafi Ettehadie.). Tehran: Sepehr.
  • Brugsch, H. K. (1988). Reise der K. preussischen Gesandtschaft nach Persien 1860 und 1861(French Edition). (Translated by M. H. Kordbache). (Vol. 2). Tehran: Ettelaat.
  • Brugsch, H. K. (1995). Im Lande Der Sonne (French Edition). (Translated by M. Jalilvand). Tehran: Nashre Markaz.
  • Dallemagne, H. R. (1999). ‫Du Khorassan au Pays des Backhtiaris Trois Mois de Voyage en Perse (French Edition). (Translated by Gh. Samei). (Vol. 1). Tehran: Tavous.
  • De Gobineau, J. A. (1962). Nouvelles Asiatiques (French Edition). (Translated by O. Ghaffari). Tehran: Dehkhoda.
  • De Kotzebue, M. (1986). Narrative of a Journey into Persia, in the Suite of the Imperial Russian Embassy in the Year. (Translated by M. Hedayat). Tehran: Javidan.
  • Dehghani, R. (2014). Iranians People History in Qajar Era. Tehran: Parsehbooks.
  • Drouville, G. (1988). Voyage En Perse (Fait En 1812 Et 1813) (French Edition). (Translated by M. Etemad Moghaddam). (3rd). Tehran: Shabaviz.
  • Farbod, F. (2009). The Influence of Industrial Revolution on The Persian Textile Design of Qajar Period (From Pattern Design Aspect). Thesis for Ph.D. in Art Studies. School of Art and Architecture. Tarbiat Modarres University. Tehran.
  • Farbod, F. (2016). Functional and Decorative Properties of Outdoor Fabric Curtains in the Qajar Buildings (Case Study: Gloestan Palace). Honar-ha-ye Karbordi (Journal of Applied Arts). July. 8. 27- 37.
  • Farshidnik, F. Afhami, R. Ayatollahi, H. (2010). Mihrabi Rugs Structure: Representation of Mosque Architecture in Rug Design. GOLJAAM (Quarterly Scientific-Research Iran Carpet Scientific Association). Autumn and Winter. 14. 9- 28.
  • Feuvrier, J. (1983). Trois ans à la cour de Perse (French Edition). (Translated by A. E. Ashtiani). (2nd). Tehran: Donya-ye Ketab.
  • Foroughinia, M. (2015). Comparative Study of Sanctuary Designs in the Traditional Textiles of Iran and India. Journal of Subcontinent Research. January. 25. 69- 92.
  • Fraser, J. B. (1985). A Winter's Journey (Tâtar), from Constantinople to Tehran: With Travels through Various Parts of Persia. (Translated by M. Amiri). Tehran: Toos Book Publisher.
  • Hassouri, A. (2004). Foundations of Iranian Designs. (2nd). Tehran: Cheshmeh.
  • Jannesari, F., & Taghavinezhad, B. (2020). Investigating the Structural Patterns of Medallion form Motif in Safavid Textiles. Negarineh Islamic Art. March. 18. 104- 118.
  • Kateb, F. Mafitabar A. (2019). Restudying the Historical Textiles in Iran (Based on Methods of Classifying Designs and Motifs). Glory of Art (Jelve-ye Honar) Alzahra Scientific Quarterly Journal. 2. 67- 80.
  • Mafitabar, A. (2022). Patterns and Motifs of Applied (Non-Clothing) Textiles in the Early Nasseri Era in Light of Sani-al-Molk’s Illustrations in One Thousand and One Nights. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts. August. 2. 71- 82.
  • J. J. (2007). A Journey Through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Constantinople, in the Years 1808 and 1809. (Translated by A. Serri). (Vol. 1). Tehran: Toos Book Publisher.
  • Moser, H. (1977). Travels in Iran and the Caucasus (1647 - 1654). (Translated by A. Motarjem. Effort by M. Golbon). Tehran: Sahar.
  • Mousavi, S. M. Pourmand H. Karimifard L. (2021). Style of Interacting Furniture, Architecture and Lifestyle in Iranian Traditional Houses and Palaces (With an Emphasis on Qajar Era and Tehran City). Sociological Journal of Art and Literature. April. 2. 147- 171.
  • Nasiri, M. J. (1995). Seyri Dar Ghalibafi-e Iran (An Overview of Iranian Carpet Weaving. Tehran: Parang.
  • Orsolle, E. (2003). Le Caucase et la Perse (French Edition). (Translated by A.S. Saeedi). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
  • Rajayei, A. M. (2015). Obstacles to Company Foundation and Factory Establishment during Qajar Dynasty in Iran. Tahghighat-e Tarikh-e Ejtemai (Social Histort Studies). March. 2. 99- 123.
  • Rice, C. C. (2004). Persian Women & Their Ways: The Experiences & Impressions of a Long Sojourn among the Women of the Land of the Shah with an Intimate Description of Their Characteristics, Customs & Manner of Living. (Translated by A. Azad). Tehran: Ketabdar.
  • Rouhfar, Z. (2012). Honar-e Parchenafi-e Dore-ye Qajar (The Art of Weaving Fabric in Qajar Period. Tehran: Armanshahr.
  • Serena, C. (1983). Hommes et choses en Perse (French Edition). (Translated by A. S. Seyysedi). Tehran:
  • Shahri, J. (1999). Tarikh-e Ejtemai-e Tehran dar Gharn-e Sizdahom (Social history of Tehran in the 13th century). (Vol. 3). Tehran: Rasa.
  • Shariaatpani, S. H. (1993). Oroupaieha va Lebas-e Iranian (Europeans and Iranian Clothes). Tehran: Ghoomes Publishing Company.
  • Talebpour, F. (2007). The Story of Iranian Textile. Tehran: Alzahra & Morakkab-e Sepid.
  • Tamson, M. (2010). Tarrahi-e Noghoush-e Sonnati (Designing of Traditional Motifs). (10th). Tehran: Sahami-e Khas.
  • Tancoigne, J. M. (2004). A Narrative of a Journey into Persia and Residence at Teheran (French Edition). (Translated by A.S. Saeedi). Tehran: Cheshmeh.
  • Torabi Fasrsani, S. (2005). Tojjar-e Mashroutiat Va Dolat-e Modern dar Iran (The Merchants of Constitutionalism and the Modern State of Iran). Tehran: Tarikheiran.
  • Vakili, A. (2003). Shenakht-e Tarhha va Naghshe-haye Ghali-haye Iran va Jahan (Study on Carpet Designs and Maps of Iran and the Worl). Tehran: Markaz-e Barnamerizi va Amouzesh-e Nirouye Ensani.
  • Wills, Ch. J. (2009). The Land of the Lion and Sun or Modern Persia. (Translateb by Gh. Gharagozlou). Tehran: Eghbal.

 

URLs: